Saturday, October 25, 2008

Veep double standards...

What have we learned?

1. Objectivity is gone

2. "Feminism" is a fraud

3. Joe Biden can basically say *anything* and not get called on it.

This is not surprising. President Bush is soon not going to be the President. Who will the desperate Democrats and their leftist base have to displace/project all that rage? Who will they have to focus their own inadequacies and unacceptable feelings onto?? In anticipation of that dreadful day, they have had to find a substitute for him so they can make the upcoming election all about that person, instead of answering any questions about their ideal, blemish-free Messiah (who they project all their fantasies of perfection onto).

Sarah Palin is perfect for the part because--as in the case with Bush--her very existence is an affront to all they believe about themselves and the world. In other words, she fits their psychological needs perfectly and can become the projective vessel for all their displaced and unacceptable emotions. Obama is the probably the most unqualified person ever to run for the office of President from a major party, and Veep Joe Biden's gaffes are legendary, but Democrats in droves (and a few Republicans) have accepted the idea that somehow it is Sarah Palin's "inexperience" that is a threat.

And so is her sexuality. I don't have to recount all the insanity and utterly ridiculous assertions that have been directed her way because she happens to be a female who doesn't follow the leftist script for women and has dared to think and behave independently of their victimhood rules. But there is more to it than just that.

You see, sexuality is the ONLY thing that is really sacred to liberals. Their entire platform goes back to the deification of sex - people should be able to have as much as they want, where they want, with no moral judgment and especially no consequences. They believe we are all just rutting pigs ruled by our genitalia, and that the only true happiness of humans is in the flesh. Any attempt to place any moral judgment or legal restrictions on the consequences of unlimited sex is the ultimate threat to them. "Punished with a baby"? You betcha. That's EXACTLY how liberals look at it. Spending billions on AIDS research and drug subsidies? Of course! The public should have to share the cost of their unbridled, unclean homosexual practices, so "there isn't any moral judgment." Sex education for five year olds? Of course! The sooner they start praying to the god of their genitalia, the better!

Surely you all know that the main reason Democrats are pushing so hard for nationalized health care is so that taxpayers will pay for abortions and AIDS treatment. It has nothing to do with all those poor uninsured families.

No comments: